Lost scarf, lost cause?

A few posts ago I reflected on the lost things of our lives – one of these is a yellow typewriter which I last saw in 1976 in West Africa. Sadly, another of my belongings has joined the list of lost-never-to-be seen-again items – an old stripey scarf, which I left behind last week, either in the Scottish Parliament or in a restaurant in Edinburgh where I subsequently met with a NHS colleague. It was only when I was half way home that I realised what I’d done. I hope someone has found it and gives that scarf a good life.

In case you think from this that my life has become pure hedonism, I should explain that I was in Edinburgh to attend a meeting of the Cross Party Group on Heart Disease and Stroke – see previous post. At that meeting, the Cross Party Group agreed to ask our new Cabinet Secretary for Health two questions which relate to a matter discussed in a previous post – driving assessments.  These are the questions:

1. What processes took place prior to this decision (i.e. to centralise driving assessments in Edinburgh) to satisfy the requirements of the 2010 Equality Act, which places responsibilities on public bodies who make changes to public policy/practice to consult with those who might be affected?

2. What will be the arrangements for those people living with stroke, residing in areas of Scotland outwith the central belt, who wish to have a driving assessment?

Others have asked these questions before and received a bland response. If I left my scarf in the Parliament, I hope it helps to make the Cabinet Secretary’s reply a warm one, though somehow I doubt it – I’ll keep you posted.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Transports of delight and a bridge of despair

ES pictureWhen Michael Portillo embarks on one of his Great British Railway journeys, the sun usually shines as brightly as his jacket as he steps effortlessly on to a freshly presented train, with several vacant seats available to himself, his Bradshaw and presumably a television crew as well. This was not quite my experience at the end of last week when I set off on my modest rail journey from Stirling to Glasgow Queen Street.

For a start, there was a leaden grey sky, though only a light sprinkling of drizzle, as I set out from my budget hotel for Stirling station approximately a quarter of a mile away. I had with me a leather rucksack and a walking pole grasped in my right hand. I had the pedometer clipped in place (see previous post). Also, I was not wearing a brightly coloured jacket, though my spirits were bright enough. I was aiming for the 9.15 am service from Stirling, which promised a speedy, non-stop journey of  30 minutes to Glasgow, in plenty of time for a meeting at Glasgow Caledonian University, a mere 826 paces from the station (see previous post, again).

stirling bridgeIn order to reach Stirling station, I had to walk across the new Forthside Bridge. This is a dramatic structure in steel and glass which links the Forthside area, where I had spent the night, with the car park adjacent to the station. A plaque at the southern end tells passers-by that it was opened in 2009. On the website of the architects, it is described as follows:

This bridge greatly improves pedestrian connections between Stirling’s town centre and railway station. The bridge is aligned to better suit pedestrian desire lines and promote physical and visual connectivity with the town to establish an enhanced sense of place. It also offers a series of spectacular views – to the Wallace Monument, Cambuskenneth Abbey and to nearby Stirling Castle.

The station has attractive triangulated lightweight trusses and fluid panes of translucent glazing, and these are reflected in the design of the bridge. This is a contemporary interpretation of the traditional ‘fink truss’ structure, which is inverted here to support the deck from above. The trusses are arranged asymmetrically and change size incrementally along the length of the bridge to create an organic twisting form. The resulting structure is both dramatic and visually ‘light’, the steel masts and cables contrasting with laminated glass infills at parapet level. At night these appear to glow, creating a shifting ‘glass ribbon’ of colour along the length of the bridge.

forthside bridgeI am not sure what “pedestrian desire lines” are, but on paper, at least, some thought has been put into the bridge design for those of us who are – how can I put it? – less than agile. There is a lift at each end to make life easier, according to the designers, for those who are “elderly or have mobility problems” – or both, I suppose, in my case. When I reached the southern end, I discovered that the whole lift area had been blocked off with sheets of ugly dark plywood. There was no explanation as to why this was the case, but it meant that either I had to climb the four flights of stairs on to the bridge deck or make a lengthy detour to the station alongside busy roads. I later discovered that both lifts were a target for chronic vandalism and had been out of action for years – that merits a plaque as well, in my view. Anyway, reckoning that the steps were probably a better bet than the traffic fumes, I began the ascent, sticking to the right side of the stairway and holding on to the bright steel hand rail, now shiny and slippery with rain.

Once I had attained the deck, I walked over the bridge high above the railway until I reached the four flights down at the other end. As many people affected by mobility problems following stroke will tell you, ascents are usually okay, it is the descents that pose the fiercest challenge. My descent was hindered somewhat by the fact that someone had vomited copiously all the way down the four flights of descending steps – on the right hand side, of course (my “good” side) – so my challenge was made all the greater by keeping my feet clear of the resulting mess and ensuring my walking pole remained dangling clear of it from my wrist whilst at the same time holding on to the slippery chrome hand rail. I am confident that the inelegant vision I presented during this descent was not one that the bridge architects would wish to appear as a short video clip on their web page. Let me put it this way – I was certainly untroubled by thoughts of pedestrian desire lines, though I did wonder if the architects had in mind the same “ribbon of colour” as the one I was carefully avoiding. On my way down, a young man ascending the steps kindly asked if I was okay. “Just dodging the vomit,” I replied cheerily, while inwardly howling with frustration.

Platform 3 was crowded, and I was out of breath, when the 9.15 drew in. It was already a packed train, with people standing in every one of the three carriages. Weary from my encounter with the Forthside Bridge, I could not face the thought of standing for thirty minutes, and balancing myself against the movement of the train all the way to Glasgow.

Some distance away, at platform 7 an emptier looking train for Glasgow was waiting. This was a local stopping service, which promised a slower but potentially more comfortable trip. As I neared the train, a small grim-faced woman barged me aside. She was laden with plastic bags, which seemed to contain more than her fair share of toilet rolls. She pushed into the rearmost carriage and I followed her a few moments later.

I took my seat across the corridor from Ms Toilet Rolls, who had spread her bags over all adjoining seats. I then allowed my senses to take in the full glory of the train’s “enhanced sense of place”, as a Forthside Bridge architect might put it –  the pungent aroma of fast food, the dozens of chattering mobile phone calls, the assorted pings of electronic gadgetry and the screams of merry infants, excited to fever pitch by the jolly black Friday atmosphere. None of this would have happened to me, I thought, if I had had a straightforward career as a cabinet minister and television presenter. Perhaps if I had worn a brighter jacket….

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

New toy

ES pictureI have purchased a pedometer. This set me back £16, and for this I get a small digital lozenge that clips to my belt and counts the number of paces I have taken over a given period of time, the distance covered, the time taken and the calories burned. I have just returned from a walk at the beautiful Cambus o’ May forest on Deeside. I can now tell you that I took 5379 paces on this walk, covered 2.71 miles, took 57 minutes to complete it and burned 154 calories. To some of you these will not be very impressive statistics; to someone living with stroke who was discharged from hospital in a wheelchair almost exactly 10 years ago, these figures represent something of a minor triumph.

I shall go on recording these statistics on a daily basis and will bore readers of this blog with them from time to time – you may wish to unsubscribe now.

Archie loves this walk at Cambus o’ May because

a) it is a slightly different route each time, therefore a host of new smells

b) he often meets new dogs and new humans, therefore a host of new biscuit-eating possibilities

c) he can rush around off the lead

He easily covered five times the distance and probably burned ten times the calories that I did in the same time.

On Thursday I have to attend a meeting at Glasgow Caledonian University. The travel directions I have been given tell me that it is 826 paces from Queen Street Station to the university – I shall check to see if that information is accurate.

This recording of walking statistics could easily become a compulsion, but I’m not complaining.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Digital Screams

 

ES pictureWho is Richard Eveason?

At least once a week, Richard sends an email offering me “Breathtaking Deals!” on a specific brand of computers. Sometimes these offers are superseded by “Huge, Unrepeatable Discounts!” or by “Best Ever, Incredible Offers!” I have never to my knowledge met Richard, although apparently he knows me, because all his emails begin with a chummy “Hi, Eric!” I have never purchased his brand of computer, nor do I reply to his entreaties, yet still the messages keep coming, a weekly digital scream in my face alerting me to all the possible ways of attaining technological nirvana, if only I would part with a few hundred pounds.

Richard is rather like Sarah, Rachel and Rose who from time to time (“Hi, Eric!” again) send me emails suggesting that the next time I’m leasing a new car (which will be soon, they hope) I should look no further than their latest offer of a Mercedes coupé at only £499.99 per month – plus VAT. No? Well, failing that, how about a brand new Honda CRV with leather seats and automatic transmission – just £399.99 + VAT a month. Always there is the pesky VAT, added like an afterthought in a badly worded speech. Sometimes, in a final desperate plea at the end of their message, they offer me cut-price luxury for a deposit of only £99.99 + VAT. But no matter how many nines they pack into their message, I resist. I resist.

Who are these shadowy digital creatures who think they know me so well? In idle moments, I fantasise about what Richard, Sarah, Rachel and Rose are like in real life – if indeed they have a real life. Do they have moments of self-doubt? Are there times when the whole world seems to be against them? Do they suffer from embarrassing health complaints? Have they partners whose habits drive them crazy? Are they frustrated by the slow growth in the economy? Do they have private peccadilloes they would rather we didn’t know about? Take Richard, for example. Has he come to terms with his raging halitosis? Or what about Rose? She may be callipygian, but does she understand quadratic equations or the importance of reducing the national debt?  And Sarah, I feel sure, has wrestled for years with her personal stance on moral relativism.

This way madness lies. But my personal lunacy about these creatures is as nothing to the madness that is all around us during the sparkly, jingly, tinsel-covered “Christmas” hokum that now seems to assault us throughout the final sixteen weeks of every calendar year. During that season, Richard, Sarah, their television equivalents and the rest of the hard-sell retail gang fill our ears with entreaties to buy, buy, and buy again. Theirs is an incessant call to commercial arms, a plea to spend, to live on the edge, to get with it, to get more of the much we already have.

So the pressure mounts. In the breathless 24-hour media and internet world of these creatures, “Christmas” presents us with a series of apparently huge “lifestyle” questions. How much to spend? What to give to whom? Which Christmas cards to buy? How to sparkle at that party? How to keep the family happily together on Christmas day? How to stop Uncle Bert drinking too much again this year? Who have we left off the Christmas list? How to grab the latest must-have bauble before it’s sold out? It is only when we properly compare these lifestyle “problems” with real, gut-wrenching human problems that we can get things in perspective – think Syria, Iraq or Liberia, think poverty and homelessness. The challenge of genuinely cataclysmic human and personal disasters is so often presented on the internet and in the media in an undifferentiated way side by side with trivial questions about deciding which trinket to purchase, that it can seem that the two are of equal gravity. It is a bit like equating Shakespeare with Russell Brand, or Beethoven with Iron Maiden – each has its place, but they can hardly be regarded as equals in the generally accepted sense of the word. And so, we are left, confused and blinking, staring at a false perspective on what is important in our world – and the purpose of it all.

Are these the ravings of a grumpy old humbug? Perhaps. But I’d quite like Richard and his friends to stop screaming at me for a moment so that I can hear properly the still, quiet message at the heart of Christmas.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

The Yellow Typewriter

ES pictureWhere are the lost things of our lives?

I ask because I remembered recently that somewhere in central Nigeria lie the remains of a yellow and black portable typewriter that once belonged to me. I remember that typewriter well. It had a mustard yellow frame, black keys, German typeface and the letter “i” was loose, so that every time you struck that key, it wobbled and threatened to fall off. Because the typewriter was German-made, and therefore robust, I am convinced it survives somewhere to this day.

For the benefit of younger readers, I should explain that a “typewriter” was a writing machine that we used many years ago to print words directly on to paper. You didn’t have to plug it in or connect it to a printer, and it made a clickety-click sound as you worked away on it. Some models had a little bell that pinged when you approached the end of a line on the page. If you were in a really bad mood you could hammer away on it very noisily, making a tremendous racket and the machine still wouldn’t break, unlike a modern computer. If you made a mistake in your typing, you could either use a strong-smelling white liquid to cover up the offending letters – then wait for it to dry – or you could rip the page out of the typewriter with a flourish, insert another piece and start again.

Anyway, back to my little yellow and black typewriter. This was the late 1970s and I had taken it with me to Nigeria, because I knew it would be useful when preparing notes for students in the teacher training college where I was to be working, and I also knew that the college was certain to be short of funds for such things. In the end, I needn’t have worried – the college hadn’t actually been built when I arrived, although a Principal, some Nigerian and foreign staff and about a hundred students had been recruited. Because there were no college buildings, we were all – staff, students, teaching blocks, offices – temporarily housed in what had once been an army barracks. The buildings were ramshackle and basic, with concrete walls and tin roofs and were spread out over what we laughingly called a “campus”. There was a hot, humid, enervating climate, and no air conditioning, of course, but as there was no glass in the windows that didn’t matter too much.

I’d been there a couple of months when the Principal asked two of us if we would make the 800-mile round trip to Lagos to purchase books and equipment to stock up what we also laughingly called the “library” – a concrete, tin-roofed sweat box containing some tables, chairs, lots of empty shelves and a few books, with a light reddish coating of dust over everything. As our teaching commitments were less than onerous, we agreed, and set off by car a few days later, bearing with us imposing looking vouchers on Nigerian Government headed paper, entitling us to purchase several thousand nairas worth of equipment and a long wish-list of books from our colleagues.

After an exhausting journey and some days spent negotiating the best deal we could with wholesalers in Lagos, we packed the car to the roof with boxes of books, arranged for others to be sent on by carrier and set off on the long hot journey back to the college. Our car was weighed down on its springs with its heavy load of book-bound knowledge.

On our return the little yellow typewriter really came into its own. All the books had to be catalogued, but the college would not let us use any of the office typewriters as these were needed day in day out to clatter out administrative forms in triplicate, as well as pleading letters to central government officials about the decrepit state of our buildings and other urgent matters. Cataloguing a library which might actually help our students to learn something was low on the list of priorities.

So it was that over the next few weeks, a young Nigerian colleague and I taught ourselves how the Dewey Decimal system worked, and began the laborious task of cataloguing hundreds and hundreds of books on little white cards, making use of the yellow typewriter, and its wobbly “i”. Gradually, our concrete sweat box began to take on the appearance of a real library. We had an issuing system in place. The empty shelves began to fill up. Students and staff began to take an interest. Some even borrowed books. Day after day, one or other of us would bang away on the yellow typewriter cataloguing and recording, cataloguing and recording. The typewriter gradually acquired its own coating of red dust, and began to rust a little in the humid heat.

It was on the day of an unexpected dry season rainstorm that disaster struck. First, there were a few large drops plopping on to the library floor from a leaking roof, each throwing up a little circle of dust. There followed a steady drip, drip, drip, a gush, then a torrent. Soon the floor was awash with soggy paper and paperbacks rapidly turning to mush. Our catalogue cards floated in reddish pools of water. Staff and some students helped to rescue what we could, but much work and many books were ruined. Undaunted, my Nigerian colleague and I ploughed on over the next few weeks processing the remaining relatively dry stock, while labourers banged away on the damaged roof and insects screeched in the hot moist air. The yellow typewriter survived the flood and our work continued until we had catalogued the entire library, after a fashion.

Recently I looked at the college website. They have magnificent buildings now, so things have moved on. Like all such websites, it makes the facilities sound fantastic and the pictures show it to be peopled by hundreds of smiling Nigerian students and staff. However, I searched in vain for mention of a library. There was a description of a day care centre for students, fantastic sports facilities, and plenty of ICT equipment. In fact, it appears that the entire library has been digitised, because the website states breathlessly and ungrammatically: “The College boasts of hi-end communication infrastructure including C-band earth station, and a campus-wide wireless internet service delivery (an on-going project undertaken by infrastructure unit of Golden Konsults)”.

I wonder if Golden Konsults ever asks how its “hi-end communication” began all those years ago in a dusty, half-empty, leaking library with its card index catalogue managed by two young men and a slightly rusty yellow typewriter. It is to my shame that I do not know what happened to that machine. Probably, it lingered on in the college library for years, creakily churning out catalogue cards and requests for more funds. Is it too much to hope that the yellow typewriter is preserved in a glass case somewhere for the amusement of the twenty-first century’s happy smiling students?

I wonder.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Orkney leading the way again?

ES pictureHere are two pictures from the referendum campaign:

Picture 1

yes polling booth

Picture 2

yes-no I wonder if graffiti like this at a polling station in central Scotland in Picture 1 is one reason that some people were turned off voting Yes? Meanwhile, Picture 2, taken from last week’s Orcadian shows rare footage of Yes and No campaigners agreeing to differ but posing for a joint photograph in front of Kirkwall’s St Magnus Cathedral in Orkney. Orkney leading the way in showing it’s possible to live side by side with your fellow man or woman, even when passions run high?

As a very last, final comment on the “R” word, I am pleased to reproduce below a post today from the Facebook page of the Modern Studies department at Kirkwall Grammar School. For those unfamiliar with the term, “Modern Studies” is a subject taught in Scottish secondary schools which includes elements of politics, government, history and the other social subjects (I’m sure they will correct me if that’s a hopeless definition). I was privileged to be head teacher of this school for ten years and I am very proud of the statement they have issued, which I am sure sums up the feelings of many people in Scotland:

Please remember that the result of the referendum is not the most important thing to come out of the last two years. The most important thing is that we have discussed what kind of Scotland we want for the future and now, how we move forward, together.

If you had hoped for Independence, don’t let your frustration consume you. Lift your chin up and look towards the future and work to make Scotland a better place.

If you voted for the Union, don’t gloat. The victory is not in the referendum result, the victory will be in helping Scotland move forward and become a better place.

We are celebrating UN Peace Day, so make peace, do your bit…and help make our little bit of Scotland a happier place.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Driving Assessments and that Referendum again

ES pictureEarlier this year, when all of us in Scotland were being distracted by either  a) the approaching cries of “Freedom!” or  b) the prospect of the break up of Britain (you choose), the Scottish Government quietly centralised driving assessments for people with disabilities. If you are disabled and you want to have your fitness to drive assessed, you must now travel from your home to Edinburgh, and not just to Edinburgh but to the Astley Ainslie hospital on the southern outskirts of Edinburgh, a location difficult to access by public transport.

This, of course, has major implications for people affected by stroke, especially if you live in a rural community with limited public transport options. In the UK, if you have a stroke, you lose your driving licence for a temporary period and you have to apply to get it back through a government office (the DVLA). While it is not mandatory to have a driving assessment as part of this process, many stroke survivors feel it prudent to do so, and until the Scottish Government took the decision to centralise the arrangements, it was possible to be assessed either in Edinburgh, or at various regional centres around the country.

No longer.

If you live, for example, in Inverness, you can take a taxi to the station (say £5.00), get the train to Edinburgh (three and a half hours, £58.80 return), take a taxi to the hospital (twenty minutes, £10.00 each way), have your assessment and return home – a long and expensive day out for you, and perhaps your carer as well. I have chosen Inverness as an example, but what happens if you live on one of the islands? In the real world, far removed from the theoretical world of the civil servants who made this decision (we’ll come back to that), stroke survivors count the cost of such a journey, not in pounds and pence – those are eventually refunded to you – but in sheer effort, exhaustion and stress. A year after leaving hospital I failed my driving assessment after a relatively modest 40-minute journey into Aberdeen. In my weakened state I was absolutely exhausted afterwards. I could not have contemplated the journey to a hospital on the outskirts of Edinburgh. Faced with that now, I’d probably trust to luck, fill in the relevant forms, see my doctor and hope for the best. I wouldn’t bother with the assessment.

So what does this have to do with the referendum? Well, possibly quite a lot. You would imagine that the decision about driving assessment would have been taken after consultation with the relevant people – charities, disability groups, perhaps even disabled people themselves. However, this decision appears to have been made by civil servants without consultation and without due consideration of the duties of public bodies under the 2010 Equality Act.  Leaving all of that aside, you would imagine that a Scottish government should take into account the geography of its own country.

But in my view it is a symptom of something much wider.

In the referendum we are being asked to vote for an independent Scotland that is very much a manifesto of the SNP. As no other vision of independence is being offered, we’re entitled to look at their record in government over the last 7 years to see the kind of Scotland we are likely to have. Sadly, while undoubtedly some good things have been achieved, the big picture is one of centralisation, government from the top down and above all a growing sense of division – not just between Holyrood and Westminster, but between Scot and Scot. Police and fire services have been centralised; the  Scottish government have given us the ghastly acronym GIRFEC (getting it right for  every child) – a system of state guardianship that will allow the police, local authorities and health professionals to share personal information about our children; there are routinely armed police on our streets – I don’t recall being consulted about that; in a small way the centralisation of driving assessments is just another manifestation of that process of pulling everything in towards the centre. And now Jim Sillars, formerly a deputy leader of the SNP, says that businesses which have spoken out against independence will face a “day of reckoning” after we are no longer part of the UK. That is not the kind of government I want to have in Scotland – one which threatens and bullies anyone who dares to criticise it, and which increasingly draws in more power to the centre. I suspect I’m not alone.

Most worrying of all in this campaign has been the increasingly strident nationalism we are beginning to see and hear. As we see elsewhere in the world, extreme nationalism always divides, is frequently intolerant and sometimes violent. It risks tearing apart Scottish society, despite the protests from some that we are all having a nice civilised discussion about our future: witness the verbal and physical intimidation of Better Together supporters (routinely referred to as “traitors” on line), vandalism of posters and mindless on-line thuggery. Alex Salmond’s failure genuinely to condemn this divisiveness, intolerance and outright bullying from his own supporters does his cause no good. If such behaviour is a reflection of the SNP vision of an independent Scotland, then most sensible Scots will want none of it.

To be fair, harsh things have been said on both sides, but I fear the divisions will be hard to heal after 18th September, regardless of the outcome of the vote. Whoever wins, healing, not celebration, will be the top priority on 19 September. Changing the decision about driving assessments will have to wait.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

That referendum – a new song?

I see mES picturey friend, Ron Ferguson, has been making a passionate case for Scottish independence in the Scottish Review. It seems incredible that some people may not know this, but for the benefit of readers outside Scotland, there is to be a referendum  held on Thursday 18 September allowing Scots to decide whether to become independent, or to remain within the United Kingdom. Yes! No! Maybe! Maybe Aye, Maybe Naw. That referendum – potentially ending 300 years of union with our neighbours in the British Isles – has dominated broadcast, print and social media in Scotland since, oh, ….. it seems forever.

I have remained largely silent on the subject, with the exception of a post back in January, despite being sorely tried by some of the posts and comments in the media from both sides in the debate. However, Ron is someone whose views I respect and so I read his article with some anticipation and interest. You can read it for yourself, via the link on his name above.

As usual Ron writes in an engaging way with humour as well as passion.  His argument seems to be this:

For years Scotland has presented a deeply divided psyche –  a “confidence/inadequacy split… that has affected everything else in Scotland for generations” e.g. his wee drunk on the train. The wha’s like us standing uncomfortably beside we’re useless – better known as the Scottish cringe. Ron claims that in recent years, thanks to the SNP being in power at Holyrood, the cringe is fading and the confidence coming to the fore. (Outsiders may not recognise this view of the Scottish psyche, but it is something that is genuinely felt by many Scots – though not, I am convinced, by many Scots young people in their 20s and 30s who seem to me to have far more confidence and self-awareness than I remember having at their age). It is certainly true that by proposing independence for Scotland, the SNP government in Edinburgh has stimulated heated discussion about what kind of country we want to be. Some of that discussion has been civilised and passionate, but there has been on-line thuggery as well, and an unpleasant side to nationalism has been on the rise in recent months, particularly on-line.

Ron admits that, although he used to be a supporter of the United Kingdom, his belief in it has been shaken – with some accompanying anger – by years of Westminster rule under Margaret Thatcher, then by years under “narcissistic” Tony Blair, and finally by his view that the current coalition government has failed to deal with the “pin-stripe fraudsters” in the city of London. Then there are the nuclear weapons. This anger, deeply and passionately felt, has convinced him to vote “yes” to independence on the 18 September, because with independence we can “sing a better song” than the tune the United Kingdom government has been able to play so far in our recent history.

Ron Ferguson is a passionate and compassionate man, and this article is emotional stuff which I am sure will appeal to many Scots. But therein lies the problem for me. In order to build a fair society we need security, prosperity and certainty. The one thing that the SNP and its independence supporters cannot offer is certainty – without certainty you are unlikely to build prosperity. You cannot build certainty and prosperity on emotion alone, although you can encourage a rather nasty side of nationalism. I would have been much more sympathetic to the independence cause if their leaders – and Alex Salmond in particular – had said from the outset something like this: “Look, we know this is a risk. There are lots of unanswered questions, but independence feels right for the following reasons… x, y and z, and these are our plans for getting there….a,b and c.” However, instead they have generally played down the risks, have told us that it will be all right on the night, played to a Braveheart mentality amongst voters, given us dodgy statistics (both sides have done this) and in recent weeks have attempted to win over the most vulnerable in society and traditional Labour voters with scare stories about the NHS. At one meeting in East Lothian held by independence supporters, parents present were even told that if they didn’t vote “yes” they were bad parents.

Ron is a fanatical supporter of Cowdenbeath FC (also known as the Blue Brazil – his book Black Diamonds and the Blue Brazil is a great read) so I offer an open letter to him, couched in footballing terms, in the spirit of civilized debate, which he wants to encourage:

Dear Ron

You almost had me convinced there. A better song, eh?

We agree on so much, but I fear you are being seduced by the nationalist trap of playing the man, not the ball. There they all are, the bogey men of the opposing team –  M Thatcher (deceased), J Redwood, T Blair, doubtless with late substitutes N Farage and B Johnson, and a back row of “pin-stripe fraudsters” (nice phrase, by the way).  And then there’s the assistant ref, W M Destruction, to be transferred to another game – transferred, mind, not booted out of the game altogether. What worries me most though, is the player on your own side, A Salmond, shouting cruel deceptions to the most gullible fans (“What? Not me, ref!”), as they fight among themselves in the stand.

Sorry, Ron, as you imply yourself, all our institutions are human and therefore fallible. I think we should ask our politicians to expend their energies on achieving a fairer, more just society by working to improve the institutions we have i.e. the devolved government in Scotland and the national government in Westminster. That way we will spare the world more nationalism, division, in-fighting and international borders.

That truly would be a better song.

Eric Sinclair

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Step out for Stroke Revisited

ES picture Enthusiastic readers of this blog will remember that almost a year ago, Hamish and I undertook a sponsored walk – Step Out for Stroke – at Glamis Castle.

I thoroughly enjoyed my visit to Glamis, though at the time, Hamish complained loudly about several aspects of the day: the long journey, the chilly breeze and the colour of the t-shirt he was forced to wear being just some of them. Perhaps he was feeling his age, as this proved to be his last major outing before his sad passing the following month. Thanks to  the generosity of many friends, we raised almost £300 for the Stroke Association on that day. These are funds that go directly to supporting research into stroke and providing help for stroke survivors.

This year there will be a similar family day out here on Deeside, because on the afternoon of 18 May a Step Out for Stroke event is being held on Aboyne green. The funds raised will be shared equally between the Stroke Association and the Deeside Stroke Group, which holds a weekly exercise class for local stroke survivors  in the Auld Kirk Hall, Aboyne.

Step Out for Stroke is a sponsored walk open to all ages and abilities, including wheelchair users. You can choose to walk ten steps or a couple of miles. You can just turn up on the day – there’s a £5 registration fee – but even better, if you register in advance, you may be able to persuade friends and family to sponsor you to take part in the event. You can register on-line at www.stroke.org.uk/stepout , or if on-line is not your thing, you can register by post, by printing out and sending off this form.

I’ll be taking part with Archie in tow – a whippet now in the full flush of adolescence. If you are in the area will you join us for an afternoon of fresh Deeside air?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Referendum thoughts

ES pictureWe are told that 2014 is to be a big year for Scotland – Ryder Cup Golf, Commonwealth Games and, of course, that referendum – so, this blog’s New Year’s resolution is to spend some time during the year looking beyond Deeside, dogs and stroke. Oh, yes. There’s a big world out there just full of interest for post-stroke man of a certain age and his adolescent whippet.

Being as it’s midwinter, let’s go to the tropics.

Every time an election looms, I lie back and think of Cameroon. And I think back to the early 70s, to a national referendum which was held when I was working as a young volunteer teacher in a small Catholic teacher-training college in the West African country. I was the sole European amongst a teaching staff of Cameroonians. Our students came from across the country.

At that time, Cameroon was a federal state. It was fairly recently independent and was an amalgam of the former French Cameroons (East Cameroon) and the much smaller, former British colony, West Cameroon. There was a great deal of pride in being Cameroonian andWest Cameroonians had, in an earlier referendum, voted to join with their Francophone neighbours, rather than being subsumed into a distant part of the giant (and recently violent) state of Nigeria.

Cameroon map

Map of Cameroon

There was a national government in Yaounde, the capital, situated in East Cameroon and there were smaller federal governments, including one in Buea, the administrative capital of West Cameroon. Both French and English were (and are) official languages, although French was predominant, and the official languages were important for communication across the country as there were dozens of local languages, not one of which predominated. For example, Bakweri, the language spoken in the village adjacent to our college, was useless beyond a 20-mile radius. English-speaking West Cameroonians, being a minority in the country as a whole, were wary of the more numerous and vocal French-speaking majority. Educated West Cameroonians also had a healthy strain of humour and satire regarding politics in general and local politicians in particular. This was regularly articulated in heated discussions with trusted friends and also by a satirical columnist in the local English-language paper, the Cameroon Times. There was a real fear that this culture of cutting politicians down to size might be lost in a larger, largely francophone nation.

In 1972, President Ahidjo declared that there would be a national referendum to decide whether Cameroon should become a united republic with one central government in Yaounde, with the federal governments abolished. It was a kind of devolution referendum in reverse, I suppose. As a foreigner, of course, I had no vote. My African colleagues in St Paul’s College, always keen on lively debate, were almost universally cynical about the motives for the referendum, seeing it as an exercise in centralising power in the east, with a facade of democracy draped over it. However, it was one thing bravely speaking up amongst one another in the precincts of our relatively remote college – it would be quite another for a Cameroonian voter to declare publicly that he or she was going to vote against the government line – which was to support a resounding ‘Yes’, in favour of a united republic. As leader of the only legal political party, President Ahidjo inspired public reverence from all Cameroonians, regardless of their private thoughts about his policies and style of government.

But enough of politics and history – give yourself a laugh by clicking on the photo below to reveal the full horror of my hairstyle and the width of our flares.

Me with some of my Cameroon students (1970s)

Me with some of my Cameroon students (1970s)

Anyway, the evening before the poll I had a couple of beers with my colleague and friend, Dominic – not his real name, because I’m sure even now he’d prefer to be anonymous. Dominic was enraged by the referendum – not so much because he disagreed with the government’s plans, but because they were effectively telling him how to vote. ‘I’m going to try to vote “No”,’ he said. ‘Come with me tomorrow and see how much freedom we have in Cameroon.’

Next morning, dressed as smartly as we could, and perspiring in the humid air, we set off for the polling booth in the village. Outside the voting hut were two armed gendarmes, sporting red berets and dark glasses. This was very unusual – we never saw a local policeman in our village, let alone senior members of the gendarmerie. The local villagers were better known for their palm wine than for thoughts of insurrection. The gendarmes had the relaxed arrogance and innate self-belief of many uniformed East Cameroon Francophone officials. ‘Cartes d’identité!’ one of them said to us, intoning the ‘d’identité’ in strongly accented Cameroonian French – ‘deedangteetay’. We obediently produced our identity cards and I was ordered to stay outside while one of the gendarmes escorted Dominic into the hut.Dominic later told me that the hut contained a number of pictures of President Ahidjo and two tables, one with the word ‘oui’ on it, and the English word ‘yes’ written in very small writing beneath, together with a small pile of ballot papers. The other had a ballot box on it. The village chief was standing beside the tables. Dominic knew this man well and asked him how he could vote ‘non’. He had barely articulated his question when the gendarme pinned him to the wall and asked him what he thought he was doing. In the interests of self-preservation, Dominic meekly placed his cross on the ‘oui’ ballot paper and left the hut.Next day, we listened to the results on the radio – ‘overwhelming majority in favour,’ ‘98% support for the President in Douala,’ ‘Ahidjo thanks the people’. The referendum had achieved its purpose – Cameroon would now become a united republic.

It may be unfair to compare the efforts of a newly independent African state with our own supposedly mature democracy. However, I’ll be voting on 18 September 2014, because I am lucky to live in a democracy. No doubt reams of text and hours of telly will be devoted to the referendum – and rightly so. My vote may not be for the side that ultimately wins. But at least no one can tell me to vote oui and stop me from voting non – yet – and that’s something we have that’s beyond value, something gained through blood sweat and tears, and something worth remembering as we enter 2014.

Happy new year when it comes.

A version of this post appeared in the Scottish Review in June 2010.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments